Arlester is a unique and distinctive given name of English origin. It is derived from the Old English words "earn" meaning "eagle" and "strete" which means "street". Thus, the name Arlester can be interpreted as "eagle street".
The name Arlester has a strong and powerful ring to it, reflecting its avian namesake. It is not a name that has been particularly popular throughout history, but it has been used by some notable individuals over time.
One famous bearer of the name Arlester was jazz musician Lester Young, who was often referred to by his nickname "Pres" instead of his given name Arlester. Young was an influential tenor saxophonist and a key figure in the development of modern jazz during the 1930s and 1940s.
Despite its rarity, the name Arlester has been passed down through generations and continues to be chosen by some parents today for their sons. While it may not be as widely recognized as some other names, those who bear the name Arlester carry with them a unique and distinctive identity rooted in English history and culture.
Based on the statistics provided, the name Arlester has seen a varying number of births in the United States over several decades, with some peaks and troughs.
From 1921 to 1934, there were consistently low numbers of babies named Arlester each year, ranging from 5 to 7 births annually. However, this period also included two years (1926 and 1941) where the number of births was higher, with 8 and 7 respectively.
The years 1938 to 1955 saw another dip in Arlester births, with numbers consistently around 5 each year. There were only two exceptions: 1946 and 1950, where the number of births increased slightly to 5 and 11 respectively.
From 1956 onwards, there was a period of relative stability for the name Arlester. The number of births varied between 5 and 7 each year, with no significant peaks or troughs. This trend continued until at least 1978, which is the latest year included in the statistics provided.
Overall, while the name Arlester has seen some fluctuations in popularity over the years, it has remained a relatively uncommon name in the United States. With a total of 188 births recorded between 1921 and 1978, it is clear that this name has been chosen for a small but steady number of children each year.